DOI 10.51255/2311–603X_2025_1_133

L. A. Gerd. Paul Anderson and his visit to Palestine in 1923 // Petersburg historical journal, no. 1,
2025, pp. 133–145

Abstract:

The properties of the Russian institutions in the Holy Land before the First World War belonged to the Russian Government, The Imperial Orthodox Palestine Society and the Russian Ecclesiastical Mission. During the British administration of Palestine (1917–1948) they were a subject of endless discussions. Both the Russian emigrant organizations (the Palestine Society abroad and the Ecclesiastical Mission, subject to the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad) on one side, and the Soviet Government on the other side pretended to be legal owners of the properties. The administration of the mandate took the responsibility over the Russian properties, rented them out and used the money for supporting the Russians in Jerusalem and for maintenance of the buildings. The British authorities put the issue on a solid law base and did not admit to the administration either the Soviet representatives, or the Russian emigrants. The correspondence about the visit to Palestine in Summer 1923 of Paul Anderson, member of the Young Christian men’s organization, famous for his activities among the Russian emigrants, contributes to the picture of the complicated relations between the Palestine Society and the British administration. The documents on Anderson’s visit are of primary importance for the history of the Palestine Society abroad and its contacts in the 1920s. They are a logical supplement to the series of attempts of the Society to restore its legal status in Palestine, which it undertook during the whole period of the British Mandate.

Key words: Orthodox Palestine Society, The Holy Land, the British Mandate, Russian properties in Palestine, Russian emigration, YMCA.

Author:

Gerd, Lora Aleksandrovna — Dr. in History, Leading Researcher, Department of General History, St. Petersburg Institute of History, Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg, Russia).
E-mail: loragerd@gmail.com

References:

ALEXEEVA, I. A. Istoriya vsemirnogo khristianskogo molodezhnogo dvizheniya v Rossii [The History of the World Christian Youth Movement in Russia. In Russ.]. Moscow, AIRO-XXI, 2007.

BATALDEN, S. Sud’ba russkogo zemlevladeniya v Jerusalime vo vremya Palestinskogo mandata [The Fate of the Russian Land Ownership in Jerusalem During the Mandate for Palestine. In Russ.]. In Palestinskii Sbornik, 1993. No. 32 (95), pp. 3–7.

GERD, L. A. Imperatorskoe Pravoslavnoe Palestinskoe Obshchestvo v 1910–1920e gody [The Imperial Orthodox Palestine Society in the 1910–1920s. In Russ.]. In Pravoslavnyi Palestinskii Sbornik. 2022. Vol. 120, pp. 103–125.

GERD, L. A. Markiza Victoriya Milfordhaven i Pravoslavnoe Palestinskoe Obshchestvo. Po materialam perepiski (1921–1923) [The Marquess Victoria Milford Haven and the Orthodox Palestine Society (Based on Her Correspondence, 1921–1923). In Russ.]. In Pravoslavnyi Palestinskii Sbornik. 2023. Vol. 122, pp. 72–91.

GERD, L. A. Russkie imushchestva v Palestine v 1920e gody (po materialam britanskikh arkhivov) [The Russian Properties in Palestine in the 1920s (Based on British Archives). In Russ.] In Peterburgskii istoricheskii zhurnal. 2023. No 4 (40), pp. 82–96.

GUS’KOVA, D. M. YMCA v Rossii: istoriya I nastoiashchee [YMCA in Russia: Past and Present.
In Russ.]. In Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2006. No 1–2, pp. 159–175.

HOPWOOD, D. The Russian Presence in Syria and Palestine, 1843–1914: Church and Politics in the Near East. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.

HYAMSON ALBERT, M. Palestine under the Mandate, 1920–1948. Taylor & Francis, 2022.

LISOVOI, N. N. Russkoe dukhovnoe I politicheskoe prisutstvie v Sviatoi Zemle I na Blizhnem Vostoke v XIX — nachale ХХ vv. [Russian Spiritual and Political Presence in the Holy Land and the Near East in the 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Century. In Russ.]. Moscow, Indrik, 2006.

LOUIS, R. WM., STOOKEY, R. W. (Eds.) The End of the Palestine Mandate. University of Texas Press,
1986.

LOWRIE, D. A. The Light of Russia. An Introduction to the Russian Church. Prague, YMCA Press, 1923.

LUXENBERG, A. X. The Palestine Mandate and the Creation of Israel, 1920–1949. Broomal, PA, Mason Crest Publishers, 2014.

MAZZA, R. Jerusalem. From the Ottomans to the British. London — New York: I. B. Tauris Publishers, 2009.

MILLER, M. L. The American YMCA and Russian Culture: The Preservation and Expansion of Orthodox Christianity, 1900–1940. Lanham, Maryland, Lexington Books, 2013.

MILLER, M. L. Paul B. Anderson: Advocate for Russian Christians During the Era of Soviet Power
(forthcoming).

MILLER, M. L. Paul B. Anderson, amerikanskii HSML i russkie pravoslavnye, 1900–1940 [Paul B. Anderson, the American YMCA and the Russian Orthodox. In Russ.]. In Vestnik SPbGU. Ser. 2. 2016. No 1, pp. 42–51.

SAFONOV, D. Russkaya Dukhovnaya Missiya v Ierusalime v 1921–1923 gg. (po novym documentam iz arkhiva Svyato-Troitskoi seminarii v Jordanville (USA)) [The Russian Ecclesiastical Mission in Jerusalem in 1921–1923 (Based on New Documents from the Archives of St. Trinity Seminary in Jordanville (the USA)). In Russ.]. In Sretenskii Sbornik. 2010. Vol. 2, pp. 519–595.

SAFONOV, D. Poezdka N. R. Selezneva v 1923 g. v Evropu [The Voyage of N. R. Seleznev to Europe in 1923 In Russ.]. In Ierusalimskii Vestnik Imperatorskogo Pravoslavnogo Palestinskogo Obshchestva. 2012. Vol. 2. Jerusalem, 2012. P. 175–186.

SAFONOV, D. Dejatel’nost’ N. R. Selezneva v documentakh Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Izrail’a [The activities of N. R. Selznev After the Documents from the State Archives of Israel. In Russ.]. In Ierusalimskii Vestnik Imperatorskogo Pravoslavnogo Palestinskogo Obshchestva. 2014. Vol. 3–4. Jerusalem, 2013. P. 113–216.

SAFONOV, D. V. Russkie lyudi i russkoe imushchestvo na Svyatoi Zemle v documentakh upravlyayushchego podvor’yami Pravoslavnogo Palestinskogo Obshchestva v Ierusalime (1919–1925) [The Russians and the Russian Properties in the Holy Land After the Documents of the Administrator of the Dependencies of the Orthodox Palestine Society in Jerusalem (1919–1925). In Russ.]. In Khristianstvo na Blizhnem Vostoke. 1923. No 4, pp. 4–84.

STAUROU, T. G. Russian Interests in Palestine, 1882–1914. A study of Religious and Educational
Enterprise. Thessalonike, Institute for Balkan Studies, 1963.

URIASOV, M. N. Upravlyayushchie podvor’yami Pravoslavnogo Palestinskogo Obshestva v Ierusalime s 1919 po 1951 gody [The Administrators of the Dependencies of the Orthodox Palestine Society in Jerusalem from 1919 to 1951. In Russ.]. In Khristianstvo na Blizhnem Vostoke. 2021. Vol. 5. No 2, pp. 145–154.

Перейти к полноэкранному режиму

Similar Posts

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — S. G. Nelipovich. THE ROMANIAN CAMPAIGN: COMBAT LOSSES (SEPTEMBER 1916 — JANUARY 1917)

The combat losses of the opposing armies are indicative not only of the casualties and the intensity of the fighting, but also a factor in assessing the combat effectiveness of the troops. The article, which is based on documents from the State Military Historical Archive of Bulgaria (DVIA), the Russian State Military Historical Archive (RGVIA), the Austrian State Archive (ÖStA), the Bavarian Main State Archive (BayHSA), and information collected by researchers from different countries, identifies and clarifies the losses of the armies of Bulgaria, Romania, Austria-Hungary, the German, Ottoman and Russian Empires during the Romanian campaign (September 1916 — January 1917). The substantial losses sustained by the Romanian army in Transylvania, particularly in Dobrudzha, were a contributing factor to the defeat of the Romanian forces in the autumn and winter of 1916. This ultimately resulted in the loss of Wallachia and Bucharest. Researchers have not yet reached a consensus on the precise figure for the size of the losses suffered by the Romanian army, which is estimated to be between 300 thousand and 500 thousand men. The losses sustained by the Russian armies of the Romanian Front are documented for the first time (totalling up to 262 thousand men). The losses sustained by the armed forces of the Quadruple Alliance during the Romanian campaign of 1916 were significant, with a total of 167,000 casualties recorded. This was primarily attributable to the intensity of the hostilities. The Bulgarian army suffered significant losses, with estimates reaching up to 55,000 casualties.

|

PHJ №1 (45) 2025 — A. V. Ashikhmin, D. N. Shilov. “WELL, BUT NOT THE TIME”. THE LAST REPORTS OF M. M. SPERANSKY TO EMPEROR ALEXANDER I ON THE REFORM OF THE SENATE IN 1811

This research is dedicated to the unfinished reform of the Senate carried out by Speransky in 1811. The authors analyzed a set of documents deposited in the Russian State Historical Archive in the fund of the Special Committee of Chairmen of Departments of the State Council (F. 1164), consisting of 32 parts. These documents were interpreted by researchers since the beginning of the 20th century, and their archival systematization was carried out during that period by A. R. Dobrokhotov, clerk of the State Chancery. Despite the obvious relevance of these sources for the history of such large-scale state transformations, most of them have not yet been published. Based on the research of predecessors, source studies, and archaeological research, the history of this collection is reconstructed. This archival complex fits into the history of the Senate reform in 1911, and the role of Speransky and other members of the State Сouncil in its development is revealed. The authors describe and analyze the contents of reform documents, including preparatory projects dating back to Catherine’s reign. This collection provides a comprehensive source on senatorial reform developed by Speransky. Access to these documents and their analysis helps us better understand the ideas of the reformer and his methods of working with historical and contemporary materials, as well as methods of communicating and defending his opinions during discussions. It also reveals additional aspects Speransky’s “technical bureau” work during its early period. For the first time in more than a century of research, the most important documents of the reform authored by Speransky were published — the note “On the formation of the Senate”, with attached drafts of manifesto and decrees, and the note “On the timeliness of establishing the Senate”, comprising parts 17 and 18 of the archival collection under consideration.

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — O. V. Tatarnikov. THE FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ORENBURG TELEVISION STUDIO DURING THE “THAW” (1961–1964)

The article examines the period of formation and development of the Orenburg Television Studio in 1961–1964. The main focus is on studying the structure of the TV studio, its repertoire and the everyday moments of its work. The article also describes various difficulties that plagued Orenburg television Broadcasting in the early years of its operation. The author emphasizes the influence of the “thaw” era on the active development of central and regional television in the USSR. Due to the fact that television staff have a certain creative freedom during this period, the Orenburg Television Studio was able to come from chaotic broadcasting to regular production of programs and films of its own production on central television in the 4 years that fell during this era. The author concludes that Orenburg television of the “thaw” era simultaneously combined an educational, entertaining and ideological repertoire. This feature has allowed local television broadcasting to become one of the main ways for Orenburg residents to spend their leisure time. The article is based on an extensive source base consisting of office records, periodical materials and sources of personal origin.

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — K. V. Godunov. DEBATES ON CIVIL WAR DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR

This article examines how the debates that took place during the First World War influenced the dissemination of the concept of “civil war” and the impact this had on the political situation of the time. Particular attention is paid to discussions within the radical socialist milieu. It is demonstrated that the proponents of the slogan advocating the transformation of the imperialist war into a civil war — first and foremost, V. I. Lenin and his supporters — acted within a specific historical and ideological context. They took into account the earlier discursive articulations of civil war as well as the experiences of socialists in other countries, particularly the rhetoric of Karl Liebknecht. Drawing on the views of prominent Bolsheviks such as A. G. Shlyapnikov, A. M. Kollontai, and N. I. Bukharin, the study shows that not all members of the party unequivocally supported Lenin’s call for civil war. Even among Lenin’s prominent allies, interpretations of the slogan varied, with differing views expressed regarding its meaning and practical implementation. Debates about the means of ending the global conflict and about the prospects for revolution and civil war were significant in several respects. During the First World War, the Bolsheviks acquired the reputation of being the “party of civil war”. This image played a major role in various anti-Bolshevik propaganda campaigns in 1917, even though in reality, not all members of the party fully endorsed Lenin’s position. Disputes surrounding the transformation of the imperialist war into a civil war contributed to the cultural preparation for internal conflict. The notion of “civil war” gained renewed momentum and expanded its reach; its articulation during the crises of the First World War contributed to the radicalisation of the political situation. These debates among socialists led party activists at various levels — regardless of their agreement or disagreement with the necessity of civil war — to engage with the idea and to participate in the development of a political language centred around violence.

PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — B. P. Milovidov. CAPTURED DOCTORS OF THE NAPOLEONIC ARMY AT WORK IN RUSSIAN MILITARY HOSPITALS: URGENT NEED VS CENTRALIZED REGULATION

The article under scrutiny herein sets forth a discussion on the utilisation of prisoners of war belonging to Napoleon’s army medical personnel during the years 1812–1814, who were employed within the Russian military hospital infrastructure. In an effort to reduce costs and partially offset the additional burden on the treasury, which had the unexpected task of maintaining an entire army, the Russian government sought to utilise prisoners within the country’s economy. This initiative represented a continuation of a broader policy initiated during peacetime, aimed at attracting qualified foreign specialists to Russia. Approximately half of the medical personnel captured in officer rank were able to contribute to the functioning of military hospitals. This represented approximately 19 % of the Russian military’s medical personnel in officer grades. The necessity for medical personnel was exceedingly pressing. Doctors participated voluntarily, motivated by financial incentives. The primary regulatory document was the regulation prepared by J. V. Willie and approved by M. I. Kutuzov on December 24, 1812. However, in reality, the process of attracting captured doctors to work in hospitals was largely chaotic. The central authorities’ efforts were not the primary factor in the success of this process; rather, it was the result of other factors. The excessive centralisation and lack of coordination between military and civilian authorities, local and central management structures, and various departments of the Ministry of War created problems. The remuneration of the captured doctors was determined on an individual basis by the central office of the Ministry of War and persisted for a considerable duration. However, this was partially offset by the actions of local authorities, who were guided by other legislative norms of their choosing, which seemed more or less appropriate to the situation.