DOI 10.51255/2311–603X_2025_1_23

O. Yu. Malinova-Tziafeta. The сatastrophic flood 1924 and the urban economy of Leningrad —
was there a catastrophe? // Petersburg historical journal, no. 1, 2025, pp. 23–35

Abstract:

The article examines the use of the word “catastrophe” in relation to the floods and epidemics
in St. Petersburg/Leningrad, and analyses the transformation of its meaning in relation to the catastrophic flood of 1924. The study shows that prior to the revolution, both floods and epidemics were perceived rather as routine and part of state and urban order that was in no hurry to change. However, the flood of 1924 served as a catalyst for change, prompting the Soviet government to take decisive action. The flood presented a challenge to the Kremlin, the Leningrad city authorities, the Leningrad police and the Department of Public Utilities of Leningrad, and led to the implementation of new strategies for combating disasters. The flood also presented a significant opportunity to undertake comprehensive repairs and modernisation of urban infrastructure, particularly water supply, sewerage, and road surfaces. Prior to the revolution, these networks, particularly those located beyond the city centre, should have been subject to repairs; however, financial resources for these endeavours were only made available through the all-Soviet-Union assistance to Leningrad, which itself was grappling with the aftermath of a natural disaster.

Key words: catastrophic flood 1924, public utilities, sewage system, water supply, pavements, street renovation, state fundings for urban economy, flood damage, catastrophe, disaster, epidemics, St. Petersburg before revolution, Leningrad.

Author:

Malinova-Tziafeta, Olga Yurievna — PhD in History, Research Fellow, The Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences (“Shaninka”) (Moscow, Russia).
E-mail: o_malin@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-3922-8091

References:

Bater, J. H. Modernization and Public Health in St. Petersburg (1890–1914). In Forschungen zur
Osteuropäischen Geschichte. 1985. Vol. 37, pp. 357–372.

Bespyatykh, Y. N. Navodneniya v Peterburge Petra I [Inundations in Peter I’s St Petersburg. In Russ.]. St Petersburg, Istoricheskaya illyustratsiya, 2013. 406 p.

Bogdanov, V. I., Malova, T. I. O dvukh opravdavshikhsya prognozakh katastroficheskikh navodnenii Ladozhskogo ozera i del‘ty Nevy v 1924 godu [On Two Justified Forecasts of Catastrophic Floods of Lake Ladoga and the Neva Delta in 1924. In Russ.]. In Doklady Akademii nauk. 2013. Vol. 449. No 3, p. 346.

Bogdanov, V. I., Malova, T. I. O vysote katastroficheskogo navodneniya Nevy 1924 goda [On the Height of the Catastrophic Flood of the Neva in 1924. In Russ.]. In Doklady Akademii nauk. 2009. Vol. 427. No 3, pp. 394–396.

Evans, R. J. Tod in Hamburg: Stadt, Gesellschaft und Politik in den Cholera-Jahren (1830–1910) / aus dem Englischen von Klewer K. A. Hamburg, 1996.

Gromov, Yu. V. (ed.) Metodicheskaya razrabotka kollektivnogo filatelisticheskogo eksponata “Filateliya — vspomogatel‘naya istoricheskaya distsiplina” [Methodical Development of the Collective Philatelic Exhibit “Philately is an Auxiliary Historical Discipline”. In Russ.]. In Gromov, Yu. V. (Ed.) Aktivizatsiya poznavatel‘noi deyatel‘nosti studentov v obuchenii sredstvami filatelii. Opyt uchastiya v Mezhregional‘noi filatelisticheskoi vystavke “Peterburgskii vernisazh. Nedelya pochtovykh kollektsii — 2017” g. Sankt-Peterburg, 10–15 oktyabrya 2017 g. Kazan, OOO „Buk“, 2017, pp. 47–54.

Lenger, F. Metropolen der Moderne: Eine europäische Stadtgeschichte seit 1850. München, C. H. Beck, 2013.

Malinova-Tziafeta, O. Y. Iz goroda na dachu: sotsiokul‘turnye faktory osvoeniya dachnogo prostranstva vokrug Peterburga (1860–1914) [From City to Dacha: Sociokultural Factors of Development of Dacha Belt around St. Petersburg. In Russ.]. St. Petersburg, Izdatel‘stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2013. 336 p.

Malinova-Tziafeta, O. Y. Kontrol‘ OGPU — NKVD: Inostrannye spetsialisty i predstaviteli netitul‘nykh narodov v treste “Vodokanalizatsiya” (1918 — pervaya polovina 1930-kh gg.) [Power of the Secret Services: Foreign Specialists and Representatives of Non-Titular Peoples in the Trust “Vodokanalizatsiya” (1918 — First Half of the 1930s). In Russ.]. In Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series 4, History. Regional Studies. International Relations. 2021. Vol. 26. No 5, pp. 126–138.

Malinova-Tziafeta, O. Y. Kontrol‘ spetssluzhb v kommunal‘nom khozyaistve Leningrada i bor‘ba za
distsiplinu (1918 — pervaya polovina 1930-kh gg.) [Power of the Secret Services in Leningrads`s Communal Economies in the Fight for Discipline (1918 — the First Half of the 1930s). In Russ.]. In Modern History of Russia. 2021. Vol. 11. No 4, pp. 947–964.

MALOVA, T. I., RODIONOV, A. A. Katastroficheskoe navodnenie Nevy 1721 g. (k 300-letiyu sobytiya) [Catastrophic Flood of the Neva, 1721 (to the 300th anniversary of the event). In Russ.]. In Fundamental’naya i prikladnaya gidrofizika. 2021. Vol. 14. No 4, pp. 111–118. DOI: 10.7868/S 2073667321040109

Petersen, H.-C. An den Rändern der Stadt? Soziale Räume der Armen in St. Petersburg (1850–1914). Wien, Köln, Weimar, Böhlau Verlag, 2019. 402 s.

Rakhmanova, L. Ispytanie — adaptatsiya — ukorenenie: osmyslenie i voploshchenie ponyatii na Severe i v Sibiri [Testing — adaptation — rooting: understanding and embodiment of concepts in the North and in Siberia. In Russ.]. In Pugacheva, M. G., Zharkov, V. P. (Ed.) Puti Rossii Vol. XXIV: 1917–2017. Sto let peremen. Moscow, Moskovskaya vysshaya shkola sotsial‘nykh i ekonomicheskikh nauk, 2018, pp. 227–244.

Rousinova, O. Lisbon and Petersburg: to the problem of mirroring eschatological concepts.
In Cieszyńska B. E. (Ed.) Iberian and Slavonic Cultures. Contact and Comparisons. Lisbon: CompaRes, 2007, pp. 302–314.

Tziafetas, G. Staraya problema, sovremennoe reshenie: navodneniya i poisk zashchity ot nikh v Sankt-Peterburge/Leningrade (1703–1924) [Old Problem, Modern Solution: Floods and Protection in St. Petersburg/Leningrad (1703–1924). In Russ.] In Petersburg historical journal. 2025. No 1, pp. 36–47.

Перейти к полноэкранному режиму

Similar Posts

|

PHJ №1 (45) 2025 — T. V. Kudryavtseva. ABORTIONS AND ABORTIFACIENTS IN ANCIENT PRACTICE, PUBLIC OPINION AND MAGIC

The article, which is based on information from the Hippocratic Corpus, the works of Pliny the Elder, Dioscorides, Galen, Pseudo-Galen and Soranus, examines various forms of abortion used in ancient society. The most prevalent method was the utilisation of various potions and pessaries, with several case studies provided for illustration. Moreover, it is evident that ancient Greek and Roman medical practitioners were cognisant of the fact that external factors, such as injury, physical impact, or exertion, could potentially result in miscarriage and could be employed as abortifacient agents. The surgical abortion was also described in detail in their treatises, evidently for medical reasons. The article emphasises that, given the potions were the primary abortifacient, the topic of abortion acquired a magical context and subtext, because everything related to potions in antiquity was largely referred to magical practices, usually associated with women — witches and healers. A thorough examination of the sources reveals a plethora of abortive recipes and instructions that are imbued with a magical undertone. The ancient authors reported examples of dubious manipulations and exotic potions, but their accounts were more focused on folk beliefs and superstitions rather than on medical facts. They concealed the improbability and absurdity of these beliefs by referencing public opinion and the saying “it is said”, “reportedly”, and “it is known”. On occasion, these learned authors engaged in discourse with “folk medicine” and articulated reservations concerning the efficacy of the proposed remedies. However, they were unable to entirely dispel the gullibility or the hope for a miraculous outcome, instead endeavouring to systemize and partially rationalize the fantastical recipes and rituals.

PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — A. I. Bogomolov. “CAKE WITH TREASON”: THE POLITICAL GASTRONOMY OF THE URAL PROVINCES OF THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY

The issues of quotidian conduct and the symbolism of nutrition have hitherto been addressed principally in works dedicated to relatively distant epochs. Utilising the materials of the Ural provinces of the Russian Empire at the beginning of the 20 th century, this article examines the socio-cultural and political circumstances in which the practices of food and alcohol consumption acquired political meaning. The study places particular emphasis on the symbolic meaning of alcohol and associated practices, as well as the symbolic meaning of various dishes, their role and place in self-identification, in forming the image of the enemy and in politicising everyday life in the ideas of contemporaries — activists of the opposing political parties of Russia in the early 20th century. Participants in far-right and far-left political organizations frequently exhibited a similar stereotypical perception of their political opponents, adhering to the same criteria.

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — K. V. Godunov. DEBATES ON CIVIL WAR DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR

This article examines how the debates that took place during the First World War influenced the dissemination of the concept of “civil war” and the impact this had on the political situation of the time. Particular attention is paid to discussions within the radical socialist milieu. It is demonstrated that the proponents of the slogan advocating the transformation of the imperialist war into a civil war — first and foremost, V. I. Lenin and his supporters — acted within a specific historical and ideological context. They took into account the earlier discursive articulations of civil war as well as the experiences of socialists in other countries, particularly the rhetoric of Karl Liebknecht. Drawing on the views of prominent Bolsheviks such as A. G. Shlyapnikov, A. M. Kollontai, and N. I. Bukharin, the study shows that not all members of the party unequivocally supported Lenin’s call for civil war. Even among Lenin’s prominent allies, interpretations of the slogan varied, with differing views expressed regarding its meaning and practical implementation. Debates about the means of ending the global conflict and about the prospects for revolution and civil war were significant in several respects. During the First World War, the Bolsheviks acquired the reputation of being the “party of civil war”. This image played a major role in various anti-Bolshevik propaganda campaigns in 1917, even though in reality, not all members of the party fully endorsed Lenin’s position. Disputes surrounding the transformation of the imperialist war into a civil war contributed to the cultural preparation for internal conflict. The notion of “civil war” gained renewed momentum and expanded its reach; its articulation during the crises of the First World War contributed to the radicalisation of the political situation. These debates among socialists led party activists at various levels — regardless of their agreement or disagreement with the necessity of civil war — to engage with the idea and to participate in the development of a political language centred around violence.

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — E. N. Nazemetseva. RUSSIAN DRAFT DODGERS AND DESERTERS IN CHINA DURING WORLD WAR I

Based on archival materials introduced into scientific circulation for the first time, the article analyzes the previously unexplored problem of draft dodgers and deserters from the Russian army in China during the First World War. The entry of the Russian Empire into the First World War caused serious changes in the life of the state. The mobilization of a huge number of subjects into the army had a drastic impact on the economic, political and social life of the empire. Despite the patriotic upsurge of the majority of the population in the first months of the war, a significant part of Russian citizens did not share these sentiments and sought to avoid being sent to the front, fearing involvement in military operations. Among the draft dodgers were representatives of different segments of the population and ethnic groups. Evaders and deserters moved inland to Siberia and the Far East, and subsequently left the empire. The main focus of the escapes was China, which occupied a neutral position in the war until 1917. The lower ranks of the Russian police and border guard service, as well as the Russian and Chinese local populations, helped the dodgers in organizing their escapes abroad. A network of clandestine migration routes from Russia to China gradually developed. Having arrived in China, as a rule, by rail, the fugitives settled in Harbin, Tianjin, Changchun, and Dalny, then received new documents and financial assistance from employees of German concessions, Russian nationals who settled in China, who were opposed to the Russian authorities, as well as from various criminal elements. The latter have gradually established an illegal business selling forged documents. After receiving new documents, the draft dodgers and deserters sought to leave China and followed first to the Philippine Islands, Hong Kong, and then, as a rule, to the United States. Some stayed in China and joined the American army units based here. The problem of Russian draft dodgers and deserters testifies to the serious crisis of the Russian Empire during the First World War, and also demonstrates the important nuances of its relations with neighboring countries of the Far Eastern region.

PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — S. V. Lyubichankovskiy. THE ROLE OF V. V. RADLOV IN THE SCIENTIIFC STUDY OF CENTRAL ASIA

Vasily Vasilyevich Radlov (1837–1918) was an outstanding Russian ethnographer, linguist and orientalist whose work had a major impact on the study of the peoples of Russian Central Asia. While working in Orenburg, Radlov collected unique materials on the languages, folklore and culture of the Turkic peoples, which formed the basis of modern Turkology. The article examines his contribution to scholarship, research methods and the importance of his works for understanding the cultural heritage of Central Asia.

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — Wan Park. THE ACTIVITIES OF JAPANESE MILITARY ATTACHÉS DISPATCHED TO RUSSIA DURING THE FIRST WORLD WAR

This study focuses on Japanese Army attachés dispatched to Russia during the First World War, analyzing the nature of their deployment, their intelligence-gathering activities, their assessments of Russia’s military capabilities and revolutionary movements, and how the information they collected was reflected in Japan’s postwar military policy as part of the “lessons of the Great War”. Following Japan’s entry into the war as a member of the Allied Powers in August 1914, the Japanese Army dispatched military attachés to various countries, with a particular emphasis on Russia. Among all the Allied nations, Russia received the largest contingent of Japanese attachés, many of whom held senior ranks. Russia also treated the Japanese attachés most favorably, assigning them to frontline headquarters and permitting their presence at the general headquarters. In addition to official attachés, the Japanese Army also sent personnel to Russia under the cover of diplomats and students, although their number was smaller than those sent to Britain or France. In early 1915, Japan dispatched a support unit to Russia to assist with the assembly, deployment, and instruction of heavy and mountain artillery that had been transferred to the Russian military. This unit represented Japan’s only practical combat support mission to an Allied country during the war. Initially, Japanese attachés stationed in Russia evaluated the morale, unity, and general atmosphere of the Russian military command favorably. However, as Russia’s military repeatedly faltered on the Eastern Front, their assessments became increasingly pessimistic regarding Russia’s prospects for victory. Their focus then shifted toward gathering intelligence on the German forces engaged against Russia. Following the outbreak of revolution, the attachés observed growing disorder and disintegration within the Russian military. They began to recognize the dangers of blind obedience without understanding or awareness, especially amid the spread of liberal and socialist ideologies. At the same time, they interpreted Russia’s wartime difficulties and revolutionary upheaval both as a threat to Japan and as an opportunity to modernize Japan’s military capabilities and expand its imperial interests. Some even advocated for the deployment of Japanese troops to Europe. After the October Revolution, as tensions mounted due to the Soviet-German armistice and peace negotiations conducted without Allied consent, Japanese military personnel, including attachés, began withdrawing from Russia in early 1918. Upon their return, some expressed high regard for German military operations and proposed emulating them in planning future campaigns against the Soviet Union. Others, pausing in Manchuria on their way home, began preparations for what they called another imperialist war: the Siberian Intervention.