V. S. Parsamov. Republican Projects in the Decembrist Movement // Petersburg Historical Journal,
no. 4, 2025, рр. 27–41.

DOI: 10.51255/2311–603X_2025_4_27

Abstract:

The political projects of the Decembrists concerning the future structure of Russia were diverse,
yet all were predicated on the establishment of a republican system in Russia. The tradition of contrasting the constitutional projects of P. Pestel and N. Muravyev as republican and constitutional-monarchical is the result of the transfer of later ideas to the Decembrists’ era. Within the political thought of the early 19th century, both projects were regarded as republican, with the primary distinction lying in the nature of the republican system itself. The two systems under discussion are Pestel’s parliamentary republic and Muravyev’s presidential one. In addition to the two projects previously described in detail in the works of their respective authors, there were at least two other projects that were not described in detail, but can be reconstructed from indirect evidence. The concept of a presidential republic, as outlined by N. Turgenev, deviates from Muravyov’s proposal by virtue of the heightened authority bestowed upon the president, in contrast to the imperial republic of the Order of Russian Knights, a concept elaborated upon within the milieu of M. A. Dmitriev-Mamonov and M. F. Orlov.

Key words: Republic, Decembrists, Secret Society, Order of Russian Knights, P. I. Pestel, N. M. Muravyev, N. I. Turgenev, M. A. Dmitriev-Mamonov, M. F. Orlov.

Author:

Parsamov, Vadim Surenovich — Dr. of Sci. in History, Professor; Leading Research Fellow of
Centre for the History of War and its Consequences, Professor of School of History, HSE University (Moscow, Russia).
Е-mail: vparsamov@hse.ru
ORСID: 0000-0002-2976-2194

References:

Alekseev, M. P. Pushkin i problema “vechnogo mira” [Pushkin and the Problem of “Eternal Peace”.
In Russ.]. In Alekseev, M. P. Pushkin. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskie issledovaniya. Leningrad, Nauka publ., 1972. 468 p.

Chernov, S. N. U istokov russkogo osvoboditel’nogo dvizheniya [At the Origins of the Russian Liberation Movement. In Russ.]. Saratov, Saratov University press, 1960. 424 p.

Druzhinin, N. M. Revolyutsionnoe dvizhenie v Rossii v XIX veke [Revolutionary Movement in Russia in the 19th Century]. Moscow, Nauka publ., 1985. 488 p.

Landa, S. S. Dukh revolyutsionnykh preobrazovanii… 1816–1825 [Spirit of Revolutionary Changes… 1816–1825. In Russ.]. Moscow, Mysl’ publ., 1975. 379 p.

Lotman, Yu. M. Besedy o russkoi kul’ture [Conversations about Russian Culture. In Russ.]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb publ., 1994. 399 p.

Lotman, Yu. M. Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. T. 2 [Featured Articles: in 3 vols. Vol. 2. In Russ.]. Tallinn, Alexandra publ., 1992. 478 p.

Lotman, Yu. M. Roman A. S. Pushkina “Evgenii Onegin”. Kommentarii [Pushkin’s Novel “Eugene Onegin”. Commentary. In Russ.]. Leningrad, Prosveshchenie publ., 1983. 416 p.

Nechkina, M. V. Dvizhenie dekabristov [Decembrist Movement. In Russ.]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR press, 1955. 483 p.

Parsamov, V. S. Dekabristy i Frantsiya [Decembrists and France. In Russ.]. Moscow, RGGU press, 2019. 432 p.

Pugachev, V. V. Dekabrist M. F. Orlov i moskovskii s”ezd Soyuza blagodenstviya [Decembrists M. F. Orlov and the Moscow Congress of the Union of Welfare. In Russ.]. In Uchenye zapiski Saratovskogo universiteta. 1958. Vol. 66, pp. 82–114.

Similar Posts

|

PHJ № 1 (33) 2022 — S. V. Kulikov. EMPEROR NICHOLAS II, COUNT D. M. SOLSKY AND THE CREATION OF THE STATE DUMA (JULY 1905)

The published “Memorandum” reproduces the contents of the audience given on July 4, 1905 by Nicholas II to D. M. Solsky, who served as Chairman of the Council of Ministers and led the discussion of the draft legislative State Duma in this institution.

|

PHJ № 4 (48) 2025 — P. V. Sedov. OLD BELIEVERS IN THE VVEDENSKY TIKHVIN MONASTERY IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 17TH CENTURY

The article under scrutiny here focuses on the Old Believers of the Vvedensky Convent in Tikhvin in the latter half of the 17th century. The author conducted a detailed analysis of the adherence to the pre-Nikon rite in this convent, utilising newly obtained archival data as a foundation for their research. The authorities of the neighbouring Great Dormition Monastery utilised accusations of schism against the Vvedensky elders in a protracted land dispute, which subsequently served as the impetus for the eradication of the pre-Nikonian rite in that locale. For many years, the residents of the monastery maintained the traditional church rite. However, under pressure from the Nikonian authorities, they repented and did not openly resist. This tendency was prevalent among a significant proportion, perhaps even the majority, of Old Believers, a strategy that enabled them to endure adversity and maintain their spiritual beliefs in the face of oppression from the authorities.

|

PHJ № 4 (48) 2025 — V. A. Orav. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS OF THE HISTORICAL CENTER OF LENINGRAD IN 1949 — LATE 1980S AS AN OBJECT OF URBAN PLANNING POLICY

The historical center of St. Petersburg and its associated group of suburbs were recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1990. Well-preserved, despite the revolution, the Great Patriotic War and the siege, the city’s ordinary buildings became a significant factor in the designation of St. Petersburg as a major site of cultural heritage of humanity. Nevertheless, the old St. Petersburg was given to us in a changed form. The pre-revolutionary dwelling houses were demolished or rebuilt. A significant factor in these changes was comprehensive capital repair (CCR). The essence of the CCR was the replacement of all structural elements of the building (roof, ceilings, etc.) apart from brick walls only. In order to assess the degree of the impact on the historical center of Leningrad — St. Petersburg preservation, it is necessary to calculate the number of repaired and demolished houses. In this article (without claiming to finalize the conclusions) the calculation attempt is done. In the historiography this problem has not yet received coverage. From the early 1950s until 1981, the CCR was undergone 4.5 million square meters of residential space. Between 1950 and 1969, 3,113 houses were renovated. For the next two decades there is no data on the number of houses repaired, but a rough estimate is about another 1,420 houses. The total amount is about 4,533 houses, which is close to the data of the Housing Department of the Leningrad City Executive Committee of the early 1980s. During the 1980s, about 1.2 million square meters of total area (727 thousand residential, respectively) were subjected to CCR, and, therefore, about 625 houses. The total, according to preliminary calculations, is about 5158 houses for the whole Soviet period, but taking into account selective capital repairs. If we exclude the results of selective repairs, we can consider that about one third of the buildings was undergone comprehensive repair. To this we should also add that since the late 1970s about 30 houses have been demolished in the center. From the early 1960s to 1980, the number of pre-revolutionary houses in the center decreased from 7,619 to 7,411. Thus, the extent of the CCR impact on the preservation of the historic center should be recognized as significant.

PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — M. N. Baryshnikov. BATUM IN THE OPERATIONS OF THE RUSSIAN STEAM NAVIGATION AND TRADING COMPANY (1874–1913)

The article, which is based on documents from the Russian State Historical Archive, examinesthe main directions of operations of the Russian Steam Navigation and Trading Company in the port of Batum between 1874 and 1913. The data sources were used to address three research questions. Firstly, what were the regional directions and content (cargo and passenger transportation) of these shipping operations? Secondly, the importance of these operations in terms of the regional needs of Batum was investigated. Thirdly, the investigation sought to ascertain whether these operations exerted a substantial influence on coastal and international shipping. The methodological framework utilised facilitated the identification of key stages,institutional agreements between stakeholders (public-private partnerships) and goods movements within supply chains, and the nature of trade relationships between regions. It also illuminated how corresponding change and development is shaped by consumer demand, geopolitical and socio-economic situation, and, naturally, the functioning of maritime transport. The findings reveal that these changes and developments are driven by several factors: favourable infrastructural conditions in the port of Batum; location-specific advantages such as the ability to coordinate domestic and foreign transportation and effectively redirect cargoand passengers; and governmental negotiations processes as a result of the shipping company’s strong position, peculiarities of the multinational character and Black Sea region’s economic capabilities.

|

PHJ № 4 (48) 2025 — A. A. Chapaev. ON THE UNOBVIOUS CONSEQUENCES OF MARCH 1, 1881: ON THE ISSUE OF THE CREATION OF THE SOCIETY OF LODGING HOUSES IN ST. PETERSBURG AND THE ROLE OF DR. N. N. DVORYASHIN

The article examines the role of Dr. N. N. Dvoryashin in the process of establishing the Society of Lodging Houses in St. Petersburg, one of the most important public organisations that emerged in the capital of the Russian Empire in the last third of the 19th century. The significance of this institution for St. Petersburg as the primary industrial center of the country is considerable. The organisers of this society furnished seasonal workers with affordable and hygienic lodging, a provision that would otherwise have exposed the workers to a considerable risk of illness, homelessness, and criminal exploitation, effectively transforming them from contributors to the city’s economy to a burden on its resources and, in some cases, a potential threat to its stability. Notwithstanding, the implementation of Dr. N. N. Dvoryashin’s concept required a period exceeding a decade. The subject of providing assistance to the homeless was first addressed by him in 1869. However, for there to be any change, events had to unfold in the most unanticipated manner. Indeed, the sequence of events was tragic, yet it proved conducive to the actualisation of the aforementioned concept. It was only after N. N. Dvoryashin’s proximity to the deathbed of the emperor that he was able to initiate the registration of his charitable society. In this regard, particular attention is warranted by the manner in which this process was influenced by the shift in the perception of his personality, contingent on the historical circumstances in which he was destined to become a direct participant.

PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — A. V. Maiorov. KHWARAZM TURKS AND THE MONGOL ADMINISTRATION IN RUS’ IN THE MID-13TH CENTURY: CORENZA AND SARRACENUS

Following their triumphant campaigns of conquest in the East and West of Eurasia, the Mongols
refined and methodically implemented effective mobilisation technologies. These technologies enabled the effective utilisation of the resources of the conquered regions and populations — both human and material — for the purpose of further expansion and the establishment of a global empire. The Mongols demonstrated a particular emphasis on the mobilisation of experienced specialists, encompassing not only military leaders and professionals specialising in military affairs, but also those versed in civil administration and tax collection, particularly those adept in the management of sedentary agricultural and urban populations. In the administration of conquered territories, the Mongols demonstrated a preference for the appointment of administrators from external regions and nations, ensuring their allegiance to the new authorities. The surviving sources allow for a re-definition of the ethnic composition and nature of the activities of the Mongol authorities’ main representatives in the Rus’ lands in the 1240s — early 1260s. In the mid-13 th century, the Khwarazm Turks, who had embraced Islam, assumed a prominent role in the governance of the Rus’ lands. These include representatives of the imperial administration, such as tammachi Corenza and darughachi (basqaq) Sarracenus, who are documented in Rus’ chronicles and the report of the papal envoy John of Plano Carpini.