DOI 10.51255/2311–603X_2025_3_248

A. K. Salmin. The Arab Factors in the History of the Savirs // Petersburg Historical Journal, no. 3,
2025, pp. 248–261

Abstract:

The history of the Savirs/Suvars, historical predecessors of the Chuvash, has seen several forced
migrations of this people compelled to leave their settlements hastily. Thus, in the North Caucasian period (in 737) they lived through a scary invasion of Arab armed forces and had to move farther north. Goals of the article: to analyse sources and literature; show the drama in the life of the Savirs; get to the root cause of the Arab aggression upon the Turks; describe the stubborn resistance of the native population and the end of the warfare. Among them are the 11th century Persian literary monument “Derbent-name” by Muhammad Avabi Aktashi, and the works of Armenian and Arabic-speaking historians of the early Middle Ages. We got an insight
into publications of leading orientalist historians, archeologists, ethnologists, and religion scholars. Those were works of such researchers as A. K. Alikberov, N. I. Ashmarin, O. M. & Sh. O. Davudovs, M. S. Gadzhiev, Anait Khudaverdian, A. K. Shahinyan, Peter Golden, and others. The article has traced and analyzed the advance of Arabs through Caucasus from South to North. The goal of this military campaign was to spread the religion of Islam on the conquered lands and to expand the economic influence of the Umayyads. The Arab-Khazar-Savir war in 737 brought the history of the Country of the Suvars with the capital in Varachan to a close, and people of this country were forced to move North.

Key words: Caucasus, Savirs, Arab, history, 7th–8th centuries, wars, migration.

References:

Alikberov, A. K. Ranniye khazary (do 652/653 g.), tyurki i Khazarskii kaganat [Early Khazars (before
652/653), Turks and the Khazar. In Russ.]. In Khazary: mif i istoriya. Moscow, Mosty kultury; Jerusalem, Gesharim, 2010. P. 42–65.

Artamonov, M. I. Istoriya khazar [History of the Khazars. In Russ.]. Leningrad, Gosudarstvennyi Ermitazh, 1962. P. 181–192.

Ashurbeili, S. Gosudarstvo Shyrvanshakhov (VI–XVI vv.) [State of the Shirvanshahs (6th–16th centuries). In Russ.]. Baku, Elm, 1983. 344 p.

Bol’shakov, O. G. Istoriya Khalifata. IV: Apoghei i padeniye arabskogo Khalifata. 695–750 [History of the Caliphate. IV: The Apogee and Fall of the Arab Caliphate. 695–750. In Russ.]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura, 2010. 367 p.

Burov, G. M. Fortifikatsionnyye sooruzheniya bulgarskikh gorodishch Ul‘yanovskogo Povolzh‘ya [Fortification structures of the Bulgar settlements of the Ulyanovsk Volga region. In Russ.]. In Materialy po arkheologhii, istorii i etnografii Tavrii. Iss. XIII. Simferopol‘, Krymskii federal‘nyi universitet, 2007. P. 324–349.

Davudov, O. M., Davudov, Sh. O. Arkheologhicheskiye pamyatniki Shakhsenghera [Archaeological monuments of Shakhsenger. In Russ.]. Makhachkala, ALEF, 2023.

Fakhrutdinov, R. Melodiya kamnei [Melody of stones]. Kazan‘, Tatarskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1986.

Gadzhiev, M. S. O mestopolozhenii Varachana [On the location of Varachan. In Russ.]. In Rossiiskaya arkheologhiya. 1995. No. 2, pp. 29–35.

Gadzhiev, M. S. O funktsionirovanii oboronitel‘noi sistemy Dag-bary v arabskii period [On the functioning of the defensive system of Dag-bara in the Arab period. In Russ.]. In Islamovedeniye. 2012. No. 3, pp. 93–107.

Gadzhiev, M. S. Bishop Israel’s Mission and the Problems of Historical Geography of Caucasian Albania. In Hoyland, R. G. (ed.). From Albania to Arran: The East Caucasus between the Antiquity and Medievil Islam (c. 330 BCE — 1000 AD). Piscataway, Gorgias Press, 2020. P. 99–117.

Gadzhiev, M. S. Severo-Vostochnyi Kavkaz [The North-Eastern Caucasus. In Russ.]. In Istoriya Rossii: T. 2. Gosudarstva i narody na territorii Rossii v VI — seredine XIII veka. Stanovleniye i razvitiye Rusi. Moscow, Nauka, 2024. P. 175–184.

Gmyrya, L. B. Obretennaya rodina v predstavleniyakh nomadov Prikaspiiskogo Daghestana (IV–VII vv.) [Found Homeland in the Representations of the Nomads of the Caspian Dagestan Region (4th–7th Centuries). In Russ.]. In Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2007. No. 18, pp. 111–118.

Golden, P. B. Khazar Studies: An Historico-Philological Inquiry into the Origins of the Khazars. Vol. 1. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó, 1980.

Kakhovsky, V. F. Suvary i chuvashy [Suvars and Chuvash. In Russ.]. In Gorodishche Khulash i pamyatniki srednevekov‘ya Chuvashskogo Povolzh‘ya. Cheboksary, NII pri SM ChASSR, 1972. P. 200–217.

Khapizov, Sh. Gorod Varachan i tsarstvo khonov na Vostochnom Kavkaze v svete armyanskikh istochnikov [The City of Varachan and the Kingdom of the Khons in the Eastern Caucasus in Light of Armenian Sources. In Russ.]. Yerevan, Izdatel’stvo RAU, 2024. 240 p.

Khudaverdyan, A. Ob etnogheneticheskikh svyazyakh peredneaziatskikh (armenoidnykh), kavkasionskikh i pontiiskikh populyatsii [On Ethnogenetic Connections of the Fore-Asian (Armenoid), Caucasian and Pontic Populations. In Russ.]. In Review of Armenian studies. 2018. No. 3, pp. 128–152.

Mako, G. The Possible Reasons for the Arab-Khazar Wars. In Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi. 17.
Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010. P. 45–57.

Pritsak, O. Kiyevskoye pis‘mo — podlinnyi dokument khazarskikh yevreyev Kiyeva. Razdel B [The
Kiev Letter is an Authentic Document of the Khazar Jews of Kyiv. Section B. In Russ.]. In Golb N.,
Pritsak O. Khazarsko-yevreiskiye dokumenty X veka. Iyerusalim, Ghesharim, 5763; Moscow, Mosty kul‘tury, 2003. P. 53–98.

Salmin, A. K. The Migration History of the Savirs. In Journal of Frontier Studies. 2023. No. 2, pp. 331–351.

Salmin, A. K. Traditsionnyye materialy dlya stroitel‘stva zhyl‘ya u chuvashei [Traditional Materials for Housing Construction among the Chuvash. In Russ.]. In Naslediye vekov. 2023. No. 4, pp. 99–107.

Salmin, A. K. Etnicheskaya istoriya chuvashei na saviro-bulgarskom pereput‘ye [Ethnic History of the Chuvash at the Savir-Bulgar Crossroads. In Russ.]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 2024. 336 p.

Semenov, I. G. Svedeniya Psevdo-Bardesana Edesskogo o Kavkaze: III — pervaya polovina IV veka
[Information of Pseudo-Bardesanes of Edessa about the Caucasus: 3rd — First Half of the 4th Century]. Makhachkala, Alef, 2011. 110 p.

Shaginyan, A. K. Armeniya i strany Yuzhnogo Kavkaza v usloviyakh vizantiisko-iranskoi i arabskoi vlasti [Armenia and the Countries of the South Caucasus under Byzantine-Iranian and Arab rule]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2011. 512 p.

Shaginyan, A. K. Armyano-albanskaya tserkovnaya missiya v Velikom knyazhestve Gunnskom v 682–685 gg. [The Armenian-Albanian Church Mission to the Grand Duchy of the Huns in 682–685. In Russ.]. In Sudia Slavica et Balcanica. 2013. No. 2, pp. 3–13.

Shaginyan, A. K. Arabo-musul‘manskaya istoriografiya IX v. o stranakh i narodakh Kavkaza, Armyanskogo nagor‘ya i smezhnykh oblastei [Arab-Muslim Historiography of the 9th Century about the Countries and Peoples of the Caucasus, the Armenian Highlands and Adjacent Regions. In Russ.]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin, 2018. 416 p.

Shaginyan, A. K. Upominaniya o drevnikh slavyanakh (as-saqāliba) u “ottsa musul‘manskoi istoriografii” at-Tabari (839–923) [References to the Ancient Slavs (as-saqāliba) by the “Father of Muslim Historiography” at-Tabari (839–923). In Russ.]. In Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2022. No. 1, pp. 150–170.

Shaginyan, A. K. Povestvovaniya “ottsa musul‘manskoi istoriografii” at-Tabari (839–923) ob arabokhazarskikh voinakh na Kavkaze [Narratives of the “Father of Muslim Historiography” at-Tabari (839–923) about the Arab-Khazar Wars in the Caucasus. In Russ.]. In Vostok (Oriens). 2024. No. 5, pp. 251–272.

Trever, K. V. Ocherk po istorii i kul‘ture Kavkazskoi Albanii IV v. do n. e. — VII v. n. e. [An Essay on the History and Culture of Caucasian Albania from the 4th Century BC to the 7th Century AD. In Russ.]. Moscow; Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1959. 392 p.

      Перейти к полноэкранному режиму

      Similar Posts

      |

      PHJ №1 (45) 2025 — A. I. Makurin, D. M. Nechiporuk. THE TRUTH IS IN THE MIDDLE: THE EXPERIENCE OF STUDYING THE SIBERIAN EXILE BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST JAMES YOUNG SIMPSON

      This article examines the debate about Siberian exile among English and American travelers in the late 1880s and mid‑1890s. It shows that initially the Siberian exile did not attract much attention among Anglo-American travelers who published books about their travels in Russia. After the journey of the English missionary Henry Lansdell through Siberia in 1878, the Siberian exile became the main subject of discussion among Anglo-American travelers in the 1880s. For example, an 1885 trip to Siberia by the American journalist George Kennan and his criticism of the treatment of political prisoners paved the way for a lively debate among Englishmen about the harshness of Siberian exile. Some of them disputed Kennan’s conclusions. The main opponent was the avid traveler and writer, the British aristocrat Harry de Windt. He pointed out that since Kennan’s visit to Siberian prisons, conditions for prisoners had been improved by the Imperial authorities. Until the mid‑1890s, however, the British press largely supported Kennan’s view. News of the construction of the Trans-Siberian Railway began to change attitudes in the West towards both Siberia and exile. An analysis of the work of the Scottish traveler and diplomat James Young Simpson (1873–1934), who visited the Siberian exile after Kennan and de Windt’s trips, shows that attitudes towards the region had begun to change after 1895; Kennan’s conclusions were no longer relevant. Simpson, impressed by the scale of the railway onstruction, believed that the transport of prisoners on foot and by water should cease. He expected prisoner conditions to improve. Simpson warned that it was wrong to generalise about prison conditions in Siberia. He pointed out that attitudes towards criminals varied according to the style of prison administration and the type of prison. After Simpson foreign travelers were more interested in the prospects of Siberia’s economic development, as well as the geopolitical position of the region in the Far East at the beginning of the 20th century.

      PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — V. I. Bezruchenko. THE EXPULSION OF THE SERBS FROM SARAJEVO IN 1992–1995

      The subject of the article is the fate of the Serb community in Sarajevo during the 1992–1995 civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The article is based on documents from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the archives of the Centre for the Study of War, War Crimes and the Search for Missing Persons in Republika Srpska, as well as documents and materials from the International Independent Commission to Investigate the Plight of Serbs in Sarajevo 1992–1995. The Serb community in Sarajevo, which has existed for centuries, became the target of terror by armed groups and the Democratic Action Party of the President of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, A. Izetbegovic. A. Izetbegovic’s regime carried out the ethnic cleansing of Sarajevo, as a result of which the pre-war Serb community virtually disappeared.

      |

      PHJ № 2 (34) 2022 — A. I. Prokofiev. CELEBRATION OF THE 300TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE PEREYASLAV RADA IN 1954: DISCOURSES OF HISTORICAL MEMORY ABOUT THE BEGINNING OF THE THIRTEEN YEARS WAR 1654–1667

      In 1954, the USSR celebrated the 300th anniversary of the Pereyaslav Rada on the occasion of the declared allegiance of the Zaporozhian Army to the Moscow state. The anniversary was given great importance not only in the artistical, but also in the scientific life of Soviet society. Cinema, painting, literature, history, pedagogy — everything seemed to serve the cause of uniting the Russian and Ukrainian peoples. Did the concept of “reunification of Ukraine with Russia” exist before 1954 in the Soviet historical language, or was a new tradition emerging before our eyes? Which discourses did Soviet historians present when speaking about the Rada and the beginning of the war between the Moscow state and the Commonwealth in 1654–1667? The purpose of this study is to consider the language of describing the historical process in the scientific and artistical space.

      PHJ № 3 (35) 2022 – S. A. Isaev. The Creation of the U. S. Constitution: Pennsylvanian context of the process

      The U. S. Constitution, which is still in force, was created by the Constitutional Convention, working behind closed doors in Philadelphia, May — September 1787. That time Philadelphia was the capital city of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, but not of the U. S., whereas Continental Congress was working in New York City. The article deals with a question: how the events taking place in Pennsylvania could influence the constitutional process of the U. S.? Author demonstrates that the political development of both U. S., and Pennsylvania had the same trend. In Pennsylvania the State Constitution of 1776 was in force, and there was a struggle for its remodeling, approaching success in the year 1790.

      PHJ № 1 (37) 2023 – Choi Deokkyoo, I. O. Ermachenko. The Russo-Japanese War, Japanese occupation of Korea and the secret activities of L.V. von Goyer in the Far East (1904–1910)

      The article is devoted to the activities of Lev Viktorovich von Goyer (1875-1939), one of the prominent employees of the so-called “Shanghai agents”, an intelligence service established in April 1904 and operating in close contact with the Russo-Chinese Bank. All aspects of his covert work during the Russo-Japanese War and in the coming years after its end are comprehensively characterized.