DOI 10.51255/2311–603X_2025_3_102

K. V. Godunov. Debates on Civil War during the First World War // Petersburg Historical Journal,
no 3, 2025, pp. 102–109

Abstract:

This article examines how the debates that took place during the First World War influenced
the dissemination of the concept of “civil war” and the impact this had on the political situation of the time. Particular attention is paid to discussions within the radical socialist milieu. It is demonstrated that the proponents of the slogan advocating the transformation of the imperialist war into a civil war — first and foremost, V. I. Lenin and his supporters — acted within a specific historical and ideological context. They took into account the earlier discursive articulations of civil war as well as the experiences of socialists in other countries, particularly the rhetoric of Karl Liebknecht. Drawing on the views of prominent Bolsheviks such as A. G. Shlyapnikov, A. M. Kollontai, and N. I. Bukharin, the study shows that not all members of the party unequivocally supported Lenin’s call for civil war. Even among Lenin’s prominent allies, interpretations of the
slogan varied, with differing views expressed regarding its meaning and practical implementation.

Debates about the means of ending the global conflict and about the prospects for revolution and civil war were significant in several respects.

During the First World War, the Bolsheviks acquired the reputation of being the “party of civil war”. This image played a major role in various anti-Bolshevik propaganda campaigns in 1917, even though in reality, not all members of the party fully endorsed Lenin’s position.

Disputes surrounding the transformation of the imperialist war into a civil war contributed to the cultural preparation for internal conflict. The notion of “civil war” gained renewed momentum and expanded its reach; its articulation during the crises of the First World War contributed to the radicalisation of the political situation. These debates among socialists led party activists at various levels — regardless of their agreement or disagreement with the necessity of civil war — to engage with the idea and to participate in the development of a political language centred around violence.

Key words: World War I, Civil war, political language, V. I. Lenin, A. G. Shlyapnikov, Bolsheviks,
Socialists, discussions, propaganda, violence legitimization.

Author:

Godunov, Konstantin Valer’evich — PhD in History, Research Fellow, European University at Saint-Petersburg (Saint Petersburg, Russia).
E-mail: kostyagodunov@yandex.ru
ORCID: 0000-0003-1253-3886

References:

Godunov, K. V. “Grazhdanskaya voina”: politicheskoe ispol’zovanie ponyatiya vesnoi 1917 [“Civil War”: the Political Use of the Concept in the Spring of 1917. In Russ.]. In Kolonitskii, B. I. (ed.). Slova i konflikty: yazyk protivostoyaniya i eskalatsiya grazhdanskoi voiny v Rossii. Saint Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2022. P. 37–59.

Kolonitskii, B. I., Godunov, K. V., Tarasov, K. A. “Grazhdanskaya voina”: politicheskoe ispol’zovanie
ponyatiya i kul’turnaya podgotovka grazhdanskoi voiny v 1917 [“Civil War”: the Political Use of the Concept and the Cultural Preparation of the Civil War in 1917. In Russ.]. In Rynkov, V. M. (ed.). Grazhdanskaya voina v Rossii: problemy vykhoda, istoricheskie posledstviya, uroki dlya sovremennosti. Novosibirsk, Parallel’, 2022. P. 344–360.

Petrov, Yu. A. (ed.). Rossiya v gody Pervoi mirovoi voiny: ekonomicheskoe polozhenie, sotsial’nye protsessy, politicheskii krizis [Russia during the First World War: Economic Situation, Social Processes, Political Crisis. In Russ.]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2014. 982 p.

Samokhodkin, V. N. “Grazhdanskaya voina — parol’ nashikh dnei”: ponyatie “grazhdanskaya voina” v ritorike Grigoriya Zinov’eva [“Civil War is the Key Word of our Days”: The Term “Civil War” in the Rhetoric of Grigory Zinoviev. In Russ.]. In Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2024. No. 4 (67), pp. 128–140.

Shalaginova, L. M. Esery-internatsionalisty v gody Pervoi mirovoi voiny [Socialist-Revolutionaries-
Internationalists during the First World War. In Russ.]. In Sidorov, A. L. (ed.). Pervaya mirovaya voina, 1914–1918. Moscow, Nauka, 1968. P. 323–334.

Tyutyukin, S. V. Voina, mir, revolyutsiya: ideinaya bor’ba v rabochem dvizhenii Rossii 1914–1917 gg. [War, Peace, Revolution: the Ideological Struggle in the Russian Labor Movement of 1914–1917. In Russ.]. Moscow, Mysl’, 1972.

Перейти к полноэкранному режиму

Similar Posts

PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — M. N. Baryshnikov. BATUM IN THE OPERATIONS OF THE RUSSIAN STEAM NAVIGATION AND TRADING COMPANY (1874–1913)

The article, which is based on documents from the Russian State Historical Archive, examinesthe main directions of operations of the Russian Steam Navigation and Trading Company in the port of Batum between 1874 and 1913. The data sources were used to address three research questions. Firstly, what were the regional directions and content (cargo and passenger transportation) of these shipping operations? Secondly, the importance of these operations in terms of the regional needs of Batum was investigated. Thirdly, the investigation sought to ascertain whether these operations exerted a substantial influence on coastal and international shipping. The methodological framework utilised facilitated the identification of key stages,institutional agreements between stakeholders (public-private partnerships) and goods movements within supply chains, and the nature of trade relationships between regions. It also illuminated how corresponding change and development is shaped by consumer demand, geopolitical and socio-economic situation, and, naturally, the functioning of maritime transport. The findings reveal that these changes and developments are driven by several factors: favourable infrastructural conditions in the port of Batum; location-specific advantages such as the ability to coordinate domestic and foreign transportation and effectively redirect cargoand passengers; and governmental negotiations processes as a result of the shipping company’s strong position, peculiarities of the multinational character and Black Sea region’s economic capabilities.

|

PHJ № 2 (34) 2022 — B. N. Kovalev. THE HUMAN FACTOR IN THE SOVIET STATE SECURITY: THE BATTLE OF LENINGRAD, 1941–1944

The battle of Leningrad (1941–1944) was a fierce struggle. The Soviet state security bodies were opposed by both the Nazis and their allies. The former did not always emerge victorious over the latter. This can be explained not only by the high efficiency of the Germans. The human factor played a crucial role in this confrontation: mistakes, miscalculations, individual derelictions of duty and failures of Soviet security officials. On June 22, 1943, the head of the Leningrad Directorate of the NKGB, Pyotr Kubatkin, held a training seminar for his employees. In the seminar, his deputy, Colonel Iona Ivanov, made the report “Secret agents: training and the pace of work”. It analyzed the experience gained by the KGB servicemen over the two years of the armed confrontation. Pyotr Kubatkin emphasized the following. “To make an arrest with no sufficient ground, with no adequate verification is a shame and a crime for our bodies. We should have a bare-knuckled fight with this shameful phenomenon in our ranks; we absolutely cannot put up with this crime. Our goal is to continue to work so that there are no violations of the rules”.

|

PHJ №1 (45) 2025 — A. A. Sorokin. DISCUSSIONS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF ZEMSTVO SELF-GOVERNMENT IN SIBERIA IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY

The article at first discusses the establishment of an elected zemstvos’ self-government in Siberia, as well as projects on the organisation of a zemstvos’ electoral system in Siberian provinces and regions in the early 20th century. The study was carried out on the materials of the proceedings of the local committees of the Special Council on the Needs of the Agricultural Industry. The author highlights the essence and content of the attitude of the Siberian public to the institution of elected zemstvos’ self-government, and presents the arguments of Siberian officials in favour of introducing the principle of appointment in the zemstvos’ selfgovernment in Siberia. The attitude of the authors of the projects and participants in discussions in local committees to the problem of the class composition of potential voters is also demonstrated. The article goes on to highlight the positions on the issue of suffrage and proposals for its expansion at the expense of tax and educational qualifications. The analysis then shifts to the national composition of Siberian provinces and regions in the context of granting voting rights to foreigners, before concluding with a discussion of the characteristics of the electoral rights of rural and urban populations in various projects of the organisation of the zemstvos’ electoral system. Finally, the article considers the organisation of a small zemstvos’ unit in the context of the significant remoteness of Siberian settlements from each other.

PHJ № 1 (37) 2023 – G. A. Grebenshchikova. Zugzwang of Navarino

With the involvement of archival documents of the AVPRI and the RGAVMF archives, the naval battle by the Navarino, significant for the national naval history, is considered from a military-political and military-diplomatic perspective. The main task of the article is to show the algorithm that led the allied admirals near Navarin to the position of zugzwang, and the consequences of that zugzwang for their powers.

|

PHJ № 1 (33) 2022 — A. V. Zorin. DOCUMENTS OF THE 17TH–19TH CENTURIES FROM THE COLLECTION OF THE RYLSK MUSEUM

The article is devoted to the documents of the 17th–19th centuries, kept in the collection of the Rylsk Museum of Local Lore. The collection includes a part of the family archive of the Polish noble families Tarnowski and Ustrzycki, as well as documents from the archives of the Sofroniev Molchensky Monastery. Among them are autographs of famous political and military leaders of both the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Russia (Jan II Kazimierz, Stanisław August Poniatowski, Jan Klemens Branicki, Józef Antoni Poniatowski, Catherine II, etc.). Of particular interest is a handwritten fragment of an article by the founder of the Rylsk Museum, S. K. Repina, containing an exposition of the memoirs of Countess Urszula Tarnowska (“Xięnga czasu”).

|

PHJ № 2 (34) 2022 — D. A. Barinov. STUDENT FRATERNITIES OF THE IMPERIAL AND SOVIET UNIVERSITY

The historiography of higher education is often characterized by a watershed presented by the events of 1917. The change in social and political structures opened a new era in the history of Russian higher education. However, with such an approach, it is often forgotten that the changes of the first decades of Soviet power were experienced by people formed in the old, pre-revolutionary tradition. This situation is typical as well for higher education, where the inertia of its existence under the old regime was preserved throughout the 1920s. First of all, this inertia can be traced in the forms of organization of student self-government. The main and senior body of mutual economic assistance among the students was the fraternities. Initially, from the first half of the 19th century, they provided active material support to the out-of-town students. In this article, using the example of St. Petersburg / Petrograd / Leningrad University we will trace the history of fraternities, define the features of their legislative status, connections with political movements. The analysis allowed the author to come to the conclusion that both in the Tsarist and in the Soviet period, the fraternities in many aspects faced similar problems. Being organs of grassroots initiative, they were weakly amenable to control, bureaucratization, their activities did not coincide much with the existing legislative provisions. And most importantly, they were considered to be bodies of possible protest. Therefore, in the Soviet period, during the tightening of political control, such organizations were doomed to be closed, as they seemed to be a place of concentration of non-party people, i. e. a potentially hostile studentship.