DOI 10.51255/2311–603X_2025_3_54

S. G. Nelipovich. The Romanian Campaign: Combat Losses (September 1916 — January 1917) //
Petersburg Historical Journal, no 3, 2025, pp. 54–74

Abstract:

The combat losses of the opposing armies are indicative not only of the casualties and the
intensity of the fighting, but also a factor in assessing the combat effectiveness of the troops. The article, which is based on documents from the State Military Historical Archive of Bulgaria (DVIA), the Russian State Military Historical Archive (RGVIA), the Austrian State Archive (ÖStA), the Bavarian Main State Archive (BayHSA), and information collected by researchers from different countries, identifies and clarifies the losses of the armies of Bulgaria, Romania, Austria-Hungary, the German, Ottoman and Russian Empires during the Romanian campaign (September 1916 — January 1917). The substantial losses sustained by the Romanian army in Transylvania, particularly in Dobrudzha, were a contributing factor to the defeat of the Romanian forces in the autumn and winter of 1916. This ultimately resulted in the loss of Wallachia and Bucharest. Researchers have not yet reached a consensus on the precise figure for the size of the losses suffered by the Romanian army, which is estimated to be between 300 thousand and 500 thousand men. The losses sustained by the Russian armies of the Romanian Front are documented for the first time (totalling up to 262 thousand men). The losses sustained by the armed forces of the Quadruple Alliance during the Romanian campaign of 1916 were significant, with a total of 167,000 casualties recorded. This was primarily attributable to the intensity of the hostilities. The Bulgarian army suffered significant losses, with estimates reaching up to 55,000 casualties.

Key words: World War I, Battles of 1916, Romanian campaign, Austro-Hungarian army, Bulgarian army, German army, Ottoman army, Romanian army, Russian army, fighting, combat losses, Dobrudzha, Danube, Transylvania, Carpathian Mounts.

Author:

Nelipovich, Sergey Gennadyevich — PhD in History, Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia).
E-mail: drfaust1963@yandex.ru
ORCID: 0009-0000-7847-0780

References:

Barrett, M. B. Prelude to Blitzkrieg: The 1916 Austro-German Campaign in Romania. Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 2013. 399 p.

Boychev, P., Simeonov, R. Te zaginaha za Dobrudzsa. [Dead for Dobrudzha. In Bulg.]. Sofia, 2016. 882 p.

Djonev, A. Otivaha yunacite, otivaha: Pyatdeset i treti pehoten rezerven polk prez Pyrvata svetovna voyna (1915–1918 g.). [The Valiant Going, Going. The 55th Reserve Regiment during the First World War (1915–1918). In Bulg.]. Kjustendil; Dobrich, Faber, 2016. 194 p.

Dupuy, R. E., Dupuy, T. N. The Encyclopedia of military History. London, 1979.

Erickson, E. J. Ordered to Die: A History of Ottoman Army in the First World War. Greenwood, Bloomsbury Academic, 2001. 265 p.

Gahlen, G., Petrova, D., Stein, O. (Hrsg.) Die unbekannte Front. Der Erste Weltkrieg in Rumänien.
Frankfurt/M., Campus Verlag, 2018. 562 s.

Hristov, M. P. Uchastieto na 11-i marshevi / 73-i pehoten polk v Goliama voyna v perioda 1916–1918 g. [11th marsh / 73rd infantry regiment in Great War in time of 1916–1918. In Bulg.]. Dolna Mitropolia, 2022. 234 p.

Kiriţesku, C. Istoria rǎzboiului pentru ȋntegirea Romȃniei 1916–1919. Vol. 1. Bucuresti, Editura Stiintifica si Enciclopedica, 1989. 594 p.

Os’kin, M. V. Rumynskii pokhod 1916 goda. [The Romanian Campaign of 1916. In Russ.]. Мoscow, Russkie vityazi, 2020. 64 p.

Özdemir, H. The Ottoman Army 1914–1918: Disease and death on the battlefield. Utah, University of Utah Press, 2008. 288 p.

Romanescu, G. Marile bǎtǎlii ale romȃnilor. Bucuresti, Editura Sport-Turism, 1982. 279 p.

Romanescu, G., Tudor, G., Cucu, M., Popesku, I. Istoria infanteriei romȃne. Vol. II. Bucuresti, Editura
Stiintifica si Enciclopedica, 1985. 519 p.

Stanchev, S. Choveshki zagubi i tyahnoto popylvane prez voynite na Balgaria 1885–1945. [A Human Losses and their Replenishment in the Wars of Bulgaria 1885–1945. In Bulg.]. Sofia, Ivrai, 2003. 221 p.

Stone, N. The Eastern Front 1914–1917. London, Hodder and Stoughton, 1975. 348 p.

Vinogradov, V. N. Rumyniya v gody pervoi mirovoi voiny. [Romania in the Years of First World War. In Russ.]. Мoscow, Nauka, 1969. 370 p.

Перейти к полноэкранному режиму

Similar Posts

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — V. B. Aksenov. WAR AND BLASPHEMY: CRIMINAL CASES OF INSULTS TO THE IMPERIAL FAMILY DURING THE RUSSO-JAPANESE AND WORLD WAR I AS A HISTORICAL SOURCE

Cases of insults against members of the imperial family are a valuable source for studying public sentiments and the images of power formed in them; they allow reconstructing the portrait of an average insulter, as well as demonstrating the paradoxes of state practices of counteracting obscene statements. The sources show that the obscene political discourse of the Russo-Japanese War period, despite a comparable number of cases to that of World War I, is less diverse and emotional, with less prevalent infernal characterizations of members of the royal family and less pronounced eschatological sentiments and political rumors. The author believes that the state’s struggle against insults to power cannot be considered successful — in a number
of cases legislation and judicial practice contributed to the spread of insulting political discourse, creating relevant precedents and thus intensifying socio-political conflicts of the war era.

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — V. L. Piankevich. LIGHT AND DARKNESS IN BESIEGED LENINGRAD

As part of the study of the sensory experience of war and blockade, the article attempts to analyze sensory impressions, the experience of residents of besieged Leningrad staying in conditions of darkness for a long time, the perception and reflection of light and darkness in written and visual sources. Among them are testimonies from the war and blockade time: diaries, letters, regulatory documents of state authorities and administration, works of artists, architects, photographers, as well as transcripts of oral testimonies collected shortly after the blockade and the war, interviews and memories of city residents of a later time.

|

PHJ № 2 (34) 2022 — S. A. Nikonov. THE ABILITY TO SURVIVE: METHODS OF ADAPTATION AND MORTALITY OF RUSSIAN HUNTERS IN SVALBARD AND NOVAYA ZEMLYA IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 18TH — EARLY 19TH CENTURY

The article deals with the problem of the influence of extreme factors on the wintering of Russian industrialists on Novaya Zemlya and Svalbard in the second half of the 18th — early 19th century. Wintering, assumed a one-year stay of artels in the polar archipelagos, which could provide significant income from hunting sea animals, but posed threats to human health and life. The risks included the climatic conditions of the Arctic (polar night, cold) and diseases caused by vitamin deficiency (scurvy). For wintering, fishing huts (camps) were built, the building material for which was regularly brought from the mainland. Prevention of scurvy was carried out in various ways, both developed over the centuries (the use of plants, honey, etc.), and by means of medicine of the 18th–19th centuries. However, the ways of adaptation could not completely avoid the death of industrialists. The causes of death of industrialists were various factors — diseases, accidents at sea and during hunting for sea animals, death during blizzards. There are cases of criminal deaths caused by clashes between Russian industrialists and European whalers. A significant danger was represented by scurvy disease, the victim of which was not only individual industrialists, but also entire artels. Analysis of the materials of the Belomorskaya Company of 1804–1808 shows that up to a third of the artels became victims of wintering by industrialists. The significant mortality of industrialists, the inability to calculate the risks of wintering in the polar archipelagos, can be considered as a factor contributing to the reduction of fisheries on Novaya Zemlya and Svalbard. By the second half of the 19th century, the hunting of sea animals on Svalbard by Russian industrialists was curtailed.

|

PHJ №1 (45) 2025 — O. Yu. Malinova-Tziafeta. THE СATASTROPHIC FLOOD 1924 AND THE URBAN ECONOMY OF LENINGRAD — WAS THERE A CATASTROPHE?

The article examines the use of the word “catastrophe” in relation to the floods and epidemics in St. Petersburg/Leningrad, and analyses the transformation of its meaning in relation to the catastrophic flood of 1924. The study shows that prior to the revolution, both floods and epidemics were perceived rather as routine and part of state and urban order that was in no hurry to change. However, the flood of 1924 served as a catalyst for change, prompting the Soviet government to take decisive action. The flood presented a challenge to the Kremlin, the Leningrad city authorities, the Leningrad police and the Department of Public Utilities of Leningrad, and led to the implementation of new strategies for combating disasters. The flood also presented a significant opportunity to undertake comprehensive repairs and modernisation of urban infrastructure, particularly water supply, sewerage, and road surfaces. Prior to the revolution, these networks, particularly those located beyond the city centre, should have been subject to repairs; however, financial resources for these endeavours were only made available through the all-Soviet-Union assistance to Leningrad, which itself was grappling with the aftermath of a natural disaster.

PHJ № 1 (37) 2023 – V. L. Zemlyanskiy. National Democratic Faction of the Priamursky National assembly

The article studies the formation of a group of National Democrats in Primorye and the activities of its group in the parliament of the Priamursky state formation. In the winter of 1921, the government’s unwillingness to reckon with the leaders of the National Democratic faction led to a break in joint work. The National Democrats took the lead in the struggle against the government of S.D. Merkulov, but were defeated, which led to the termination of the activities of the National assembly.