DOI 10.51255/2311–603X_2025_3_161

V. V. Lapin. The Alexandropolis Fortress is a Expanse of Imperial Integration. The Symbolic
Aspect // Petersburg Historical Journal, no. 3, 2025, p. 161–173

Abstract:

The military and political situation in the border regions of the Russian Empire required the
construction of fortresses in strategically important points. These fortifications, together with a complex of buildings necessary for the life of the garrison, played a role not only in the defense system against external threats, but also in maintaining the “peace” of the local population. At the same time, the organization of the space of the fortress complexes, their architecture and even the names of the strongholds and their parts (bastions, fronts, gates, etc.) represented imperial messages and carried a significant symbolic load. Near them, suburbs and even cities of various sizes arose, populated mainly by indigenous residents of the national outskirts. The latter, being involuntary witnesses to the manifestations of army routine (housekeeping, military ceremonies, etc.), found themselves in a special cultural space. The significance of the latter was
enhanced by the fact that Russian military personnel in peacetime constituted about a third of the population of the city and district, and during the war, the Armenians who settled there found themselves in the minority. The focus is on Alexandropol, which was the only fortress in Transcaucasia, built in the 1830–1850s in the border region of the Armenian region on the site of the Gumry fortification, founded in 1807. Various symbolic messages were addressed primarily “inward” to maintain imperial identity in a foreign cultural environment, but it is impossible to deny that they also influenced the local population and created conditions for imperial integration.

Key words: аrmy of the Russian Empire, Transcaucasia, interaction of cultures, fortress of Alexandropol.

Author:

Lapin, Vladimir Vikentyevich — Dr. of Sci. in History, European University at St. Petersburg (St. Petersburg, Russia).
E-mail: lapin.ww@yandex.ru; lapin@eu.spb.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-6231-1977

References:

Antonov, V. V. Aleksandr Shtaubert [Alexander Staubert. In Russ.]. In Zodchie Sankt-Peterburga XIX — nachala XX veka. St. Petersburg, Lenizdat, 1998. P. 203–210.

Gefner, O. V. Voennye parady v obshchestvennoi i kul’turnoi zhizni gorodov Zapadnoi Sibiri v kontse XIX — nachale XX vv. [Military Parades in the Public and Cultural Life of Western Siberian Cities in the Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries. In Russ.]. In Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Istoricheskie nauki”. 2015. No. 2 (6), pp. 136–139.

Ismail-Zade, D. I. Naselenie gorodov Zakavkazskogo kraya v XIX — nachale XX v. [Population of the Cities of the Transcaucasian Region in the 19th — Early 20th Centuries. In Russ.]. Moscow, Nauka, 1991. 254 p.

Kurochkina, E. N., Ignat’eva, A. O., Los’, O. K. Tsvet grazhdanskoi formennoi odezhdy v Rossii kontsa XVIII — XIX veka kak indikator sotsiokul’turnoi identichnosti epokhe [The Colour of Civilian Uniforms in Russia of the Late 18th — 19th Centuries as an Indicator of the Socio-Cultural Identity of the Era. In Russ.]. In Izvestiya laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologii. 2020. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 145–158.

Lavrenova, O. A. Kul’turnyi landshaft kak znakovaya sistema [Cultural Landscape as a Sign System.
In Russ.]. In Filosofia i kul’tura. 2010. No. 3, pp. 61–70.

Lebedeva, I. I. Istoriko-arkhitekturnyi kompleks severo-zapadnogo sektora Omskoi kreposti [Historical and Architectural Complex of the North-West Sector of the Omsk Fortress. In Russ.]. URL: http://museum. omskelecom.ru/ogik/Izvestiya_8/Lebedeva.html (date of access 10.05.2025).
Mumford, L. The Culture of Cities. New York, Harcourt, Brace and company, 1938. 586 p.

Sokol, K. G. Monumental’nye pamyatniki Rossiiskoi imperii. Katalog [Monumental Monuments of the Russian Empire. Catalogue. In Russ.]. Moscow, 2021. 504 p.

Yakovlev, V. V. Istoriya krepostei [History of Fortresses. In Russ.]. Moscow, AST, 2000. 400 p.

Перейти к полноэкранному режиму

Similar Posts

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — A. K. Salmin. THE ARAB FACTORS IN THE HISTORY OF THE SAVIRS

The history of the Savirs/Suvars, historical predecessors of the Chuvash, has seen several forced migrations of this people compelled to leave their settlements hastily. Thus, in the North Caucasian period (in 737) they lived through a scary invasion of Arab armed forces and had to move farther north. Goals of the article: to analyse sources and literature; show the drama in the life of the Savirs; get to the root cause of the Arab aggression upon the Turks; describe the stubborn resistance of the native population and the end of the warfare. Among them are the 11th century Persian literary monument “Derbent-name” by Muhammad Avabi Aktashi, and the works of Armenian and Arabic-speaking historians of the early Middle Ages. We got an insight into publications of leading orientalist historians, archeologists, ethnologists, and religion scholars. Those were works of such researchers as A. K. Alikberov, N. I. Ashmarin, O. M. & Sh. O. Davudovs, M. S. Gadzhiev, Anait Khudaverdian, A. K. Shahinyan, Peter Golden, and others. The article has traced and analyzed the advance of Arabs through Caucasus from South to North. The goal of this military campaign was to spread the religion of Islam on the conquered lands and to expand the economic influence of the Umayyads. The Arab-Khazar-Savir war in 737 brought the history of the Country of the Suvars with the capital in Varachan to a close, and people of this country were forced to move North.

PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — A. A. Efimov. THE ISSUE OF ESTABLISHMENT THE INSTITUTION OF JUDICIAL INVESTIGATORS IN PALACE TOWNS

The article addresses one of the problems of the administrative history of palace towns of the mid-19 th century. The author notes that these settlements had a special status in the Russian Empire. They were under the jurisdiction of special institutions of the Ministry of the Imperial Court — palace boards, being largely outside the general system of public administration and local self-government. This special status gave them a certain independence and even the opportunity to engage in some opposition when deciding on the applicability of certain administrative innovations. As noted in the article, this observation also applies to the issue of introducing the institution of forensic investigators. In a significant part of the provinces they began their work soon after the signing of the corresponding decree in the early summer of 1860. The author draws attention to the fact that in the palace towns only in August the question was raised about the possibility of these officials acting on their territory. As the article notes, representatives of the local administration of Peterhof were somewhat enthusiastic about the idea of outsourcing some of the work that fell to the city police, which was considered overloaded. At the same time, the boundaries of the participation of judicial investigators in the proceedings were also specified. In Tsarskoe Selo the situation was different. Despite the declared readiness to transfer the investigative work, officials of the Tsarskoye Selo city police, under various organizational and bureaucratic pretexts, delayed this process. The author notes that in the end, to resolve this issue, the intervention of the St. Petersburg provincial government was required. The latter had to issue an order with direct reference to the imperial decree on the transfer of cases subject to criminal proceedings to a judicial investigator.

|

PHJ № 1 (33) 2022 — O. A. Kirikova. PETERSBURG ACADEMY OF SCIENCES’ OPINION ON THE EDUCATION OF A YOUNG MAN OF NOBLE BIRTH IN 1730S

The members of Petersburg Academy of Sciences played part in developing the ideal and practices of noble education in Russia during 1730s. At the time the Academy was meant to be both a scientific and educational center, that is why its professors used to deliver lectures, prepare textbooks, give private lessons, draw educational projects, etc. The most remarkable person among them was inspector of the Academy’s Gymnasium prof. T. S. Bayer. Being among his personal papers, an anonymous manuscript relating to the education of a noble boy who was going to be successful in his civil state, provides new information about the Academy tutors and their participation in aristocratic education.

| |

PHJ № 3 (47) 2025 — V. L. Piankevich. LIGHT AND DARKNESS IN BESIEGED LENINGRAD

As part of the study of the sensory experience of war and blockade, the article attempts to analyze sensory impressions, the experience of residents of besieged Leningrad staying in conditions of darkness for a long time, the perception and reflection of light and darkness in written and visual sources. Among them are testimonies from the war and blockade time: diaries, letters, regulatory documents of state authorities and administration, works of artists, architects, photographers, as well as transcripts of oral testimonies collected shortly after the blockade and the war, interviews and memories of city residents of a later time.

PHJ № 2 (46) 2025 — A. Yu. Stefanenko. HARVESTING VEGETABLES IN BESIEGED LENINGRAD

After the end of the first winter of the blockade in 1941–1942, the Leningrad leadership was faced with the problem of finding new sources of food. One of the most important areas became the organisation of the harvest of agricultural products, especially vegetables and potatoes. The city’s leaders launched mass campaigns to create individual gardens and send Leningraders to plant, weed and harvest crops and vegetables on the subsidiary farms of enterprises and state farms in the Leningrad region. At the same time, the authorities had to solve a number of organisational and social problems. Throughout the blockade, there was an acute shortage of equipment and supplies. The irrational use of available human resources led to the loss of vegetables through spoilage and theft. Nevertheless, the mobilisation campaigns helped to supply Leningrad with food and to prevent a repetition of the tragedy of the “time of death”.