A. V. Chirkova. Documents of the Doges of Venice from the 14th to the First Half of the 16th Century Collected by Nikolay P. Likhachev: On the History of the Collection // Petersburg Historical Journal, no. 1, 2026, pp. 222–232.

DOI: 10.51255/2311–603X_2026_1_222

Abstract:

In the West European Section of the Archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of History, Russian
Academy of Sciences, there are 64 original charters from Venetian doges dating from the 14th to the first half of the 16th century: 18 sentences (ducali maggiori) and 46 letters (ducali minori). They originate from the collection of Academician N. P. Likhachev and were purchased for his Museum of Palaeography, where the history of writing was represented from the turn of the 3rd–4th millennium BC, primarily through documentary monuments. The documents were acquired between 1892 and 1914 at European auctions and through correspondence with other collectors. Thanks to Likhachev’s annotations on the covers of the charters, it is possible to establish the time and place of acquisition for 20 documents: private collections of Gabriele Fantoni (4) and Alexander Posonyi (2, by the Friedrich Cohn auction), auctions of Pio Luzzetti (7), Tammaro De Marinis (3), Gabriel Charavay (1), Sotheby’s (1), “Gilhofer und Ranschburg” (2). Through the
analysis of owners’ inscriptions on the covers and on the charters themselves, the provenance of the documents is traced back to the collections of Gian Carlo Rossi (10), Luigi Azzolini (2), presumably Luigi Arrigoni and Amilcare Ancona (1), and two unattributed collectors (4 and 2). The analysis of the provenance shows that before being accumulated in Likhachev’s collection, these ancient acts changed hands multiple times.

Key words: Venice, Doges, Nikolay Petrovich Likhachev, Museum of Palaeograpfy, ducali maggiori, lettere ducali, Cohn Fr., Posonyi A., Luzzietti P., Gilhofer & Ranschburg, Sotheby, Charavay G., Azzolini L., Rossi G. C., Ancona A., Arrigoni L., De Marinis T.

Author:

Chirkova, Aleksandra Viktorovna — PhD in History, senior research fellow, St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg, Russia).
E-mail: chirok-alexandr@list.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-6482-6421

References:
Bazarova, Т.А., Chirkova, A. V. Utrachennoe pis’mo Petra Velikogo Georgu Vilgelmu de Genninu:
K istorii ekspertnoi mysli i antikvarnogo rynka [Peter the Great’s Lost Letter to Georg Wilhelm de Henning: On the History of Expert Thought and the Antiques Market. In Russ.]. In Questio Rossica. 2021. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 927–944.

Chirkova, A. V. Frantsuzskie akty XI–XIII vekov iz sobraniya N. P. Likhacheva: K voprosu o formirovanii kollektsii [Eleventh to Thirteenth-Сentury French Documents from Nikolay Likhachev’s Collection: Towards a History of the Collection. In Russ.]. In The Legacy of Nikolay Petrovich Likhachev: Text and Image interpretation. St. Petersburg, 2014. Transactions of the State Hermitage Museum. T. LXXI, pp. 122–134.

Cohn, Fr. Antiquariat in Bonn. Catalog 104. Autographen-Sammlung Alexander Posonyi in Wien, V. Fürsten, Kriegs- und Staatsmänner, Reformation, Dreissigjär[iger] Krieg, Urkunden, Manuscripte. Bonn, 1901. 82 p.

Gasbarri, G. Falsi d’arte “postclassica” nella Roma di fine Ottocento: Lo strano caso del Sacro Tesoro Rossi. In Arte Medievale. 2014, January. Ser. IV (4), pp. 253–266.

Gilhofer & Ranschburg. Katalog (Nr. 74): Autographen berühmter Persönlichkeiten des 15.—19. Jahrhunderts: Urkunden und Handschriften orts- und familiengeschichtlichen Inhalts. Wien, [1905?]. 136 p.

Klimanov, L. G. N. P. Likhachev “v poiskakh zhelannykh zven’ev velikoi diplomaticheskoi vystavki”
[N. P. Likhachev “in Search of the Desired Links of the Great Diplomatic Exhibition”. In Russ.]. In “Zvuchat lish’ pis’mena…” K 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika Nikolaya Petrovicha Likhacheva: Katalog vystavki. St. Petersburg, 2012, pp. 36–48.

Klimanov, L. G. N. P. Likhachev-kollektsioner i ego svyazi; Antikvary, kollektsionery, uchenye
[N. P. Likhachev-Collector and his Relations: Antiquarians, Collectors, Scholars. In Russ.]. In “Zvuchat lish’ pis’mena…” K 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika Nikolaya Petrovicha Likhacheva: Katalog vystavki. St. Petersburg, 2012, pp. 565–593.

Klimanov, L. G. O proiskhozhdenii nekotorykh venetsianskikh dokumentov Zapadnoevropeyskoy sektsii Arkhiva SPbII RAN [On the Provenance of some Venetian Documents from the West European Section of the Archive of the SPbIH RAS. In Russ.]. In Vspomogatel’nye istoricheskie distsipliny. 2002. Vol. 28, pp. 235–270.

Sredinskaya, N. B. Ferrara XIV veka v otrazhenii aktov rodovogo arkhiva Sakrati [14th Century Ferrara in the Mirror of the Acts from Sacratis’ Family Archive. In Russ.]. Moscow, Indrik publ., 2017, 248 p.

Travin, I. D., Chirkova, A. V. Dokumenty dozhei Venetsianskoi Respubliki XIV — serediny XVI veka
v sobranii akademika N. P. Likhachevа: Sostav kollektsii, istoriya i perspectivy izucheniya [Documents of the Doges of Venice in the Collection of Academician Nikolay P. Likhachev, 14th — mid-16th Centuries: Structure of the Collection, History and Prospects of Study. In Russ.]. In The Journal of Education and Science “Istoriya”. 2025. Vol. 16, iss. 6 (152). URL: https://ras.jes.su/history/s207987840036121–2–1 (accessed: 16.12.2025).

Zolotova, E. Yu. Illyuminirovannye dokumenty Venetsianskoi Respubliki XV–XVII vekov iz kollektsii
N. P. Likhacheva [Illuminated Documents of the Venetian Republic of the 15th–17th Centuries from the Collection of N. P. Likhachev. In Russ.]. In Art and Culture Studies. 2020. No. 3 (34), pp. 214–233.

    Similar Posts

    |

    PHJ № 1 (49) 2026 — N. A. Khrebtov. “THE ERADICATION OF ENEMIES AND CRIMINALS”: THE PERFORMANCE OF POLICE AND FISCAL TASKS BY MILITARY PERSONNEL OF THE GARRISONS OF THE NORTH OF RUSSIA IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 18TH CENTURY

    Garrison troops, as an integral part of the Russian army, were created under Peter the Great. During the 18th century, they were reformed and underwent structural changes. In addition, the functionality of this type of troops has also changed. Extensive modern historiography devoted to service in the garrisons in the 18th century examines the problems of military service and tasks but does not provide a comprehensive assessment. The funds of the State Archive of the Arkhangelsk Region and the National Archive of the Republic of Karelia store a significant number of reports, lists, orders and other materials covering this topic in detail. Based on the analysis of the Russian North garrisons’ office records and legislative acts, it was possible to conclude that police and fiscal tasks occupied an important place in the official duties of the garrison officer.

    PHJ № 1 (49) 2026 — G. I. Bayazitova, F. E. A. Giral. LETTER FROM CARDINAL DE RICHELIEU TO THE FRENCH AMBASSADOR TO SWITZERLAND, BRULARD DE LEON (APRIL 9, 1630)

    The article is devoted to the study of a manuscript letter by Cardinal de Richelieu, First Minister to King Louis XIII of France, who managed the internal and foreign policy of France from 1624 to 1642. The autograph of Richelieu is kept in the Russian National Library in St. Petersburg as part of the Dubrovsky Collection. Although it was already known to M. Avenel, the first editor of Cardinal de Richelieu’s correspondence, it had not yet been introduced to the scholarly community. Also, a transcription of the letter without commentary or translation is contained in the latest monograph by A. D. Lyublinskaya. The letter dates back to the War of the Mantuan Succession and is addressed to de Leon, French ambassador in Switzerland. The letter concerns Marshal de Bassompierre’s role in the negotiations with the Cantons of Switzerland. The introductory article provides the context for the document’s appearance, reconstructs the series of events that preceded its creation based on historical sources, and draws a conclusion about the message’s place in Cardinal Richelieu’s correspondence. The article provides a transcription, translation, annotated commentary, and a reproduction of the original letter. The publication of this autograph adds to the research on 17th-century French documents located in Russia, initiated by A. Lyublinskaya, and advances ourunderstanding of Cardinal de Richelieu’s activities.

    PHJ № 1 (49) 2026 — M. V. Druzin. “EVERYTHING WORSHIPS ONLY POWER…”: NOTE BY PRINCE S. S. ABAMELEK-LAZAREV ON MEASURES TO SUPPRESS THE REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA (AUGUST 1906)

    The published note by Prince Semyon Semyonovich Abamelek-Lazarev is one example of the notes and petitions from 1905–1906 received from right-wing and Black Hundred organizations and individuals of like views, proposing a wide variety of measures to the emperor and government to suppress the revolutionary movement. S. S. Abamelek-Lazarev, a well-known entrepreneur, mine owner, and Russia’s largest landowner, was not politically savvy. However, he saw the approaching revolution as a direct threat to his holdings and capital, and therefore, the fear of losing everything compelled him to write a “political” note annually from 1905–1907. While the note from the summer of 1905 was distinguished by its length, verbosity, and overall calm tone, the note from August 1906, published here, is practically hysterical, with the prince demanding that rebels and pogromists be killed on the spot, tried by military courts, and exiled to Siberian penal servitude along with their families. The note demonstrates that S. S. Abamelek-Lazarev, having embraced and exploited the economic benefits and opportunities of the new post-reform capitalist order, rejected and failed to understand the need for political change in the social order.

    PHJ № 1 (49) 2026 — E. N. MALM. IN THE MILLSTONES OF TIME. NEW DOCUMENTS

    The article is dedicated to the fate of E. N. Malm. With his inseparable friend M. A. Bogdanov after the split of the Socialist Revolutionary Party they became members of her left wing and employees of the Cheka in 1918 year, sent to Petrograd to infiltrate the German consulate. After the events of July 6–7, 1918 they become resolute opponents of the Bolsheviks. They conducted underground work in the Smolensk, Vitebsk, and Kazan provinces. When they were arrested in Kazan in October 1919 they shot the former Left Socialist Revolutionary, the Cheka agent Zhuravlev (Petrov), and fled. They were detained on April 19, 1920, after a shootout. On September 29, 1920, the Moscow Revolutionary Tribunal issued a decision on their release. But then they were again arrested by the Chekists. In August 1921, made the armed escape from Tagansky prison, passed to illegal status, tried to recreate in 1922 the illegal organization of the left Social Revolutionaries internationalists in Petrograd. Being once again arrested, they were in exile in Siberia. After the death of M. A. Bogdanov in 1924 E. N. Malm continued for some time political activity. At the end of the term of exile in 1926, having moved to the Crimea, he became a specialist in Black Sea dolphins and algae. He was subjected to new arrests, and in 1938 he was invited as a senior researcher to the Neurochirurgical Institute in Leningrad. He was once again arrested in September 1941 and tragically died in October 1941 during a stage in Lake Ladoga.

    PHJ № 1 (49) 2026 — A. A. Ivanov. AN ACCIDENTAL DIPLOMAT: ALFRED WILL KLIEFOTH AND THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION OF 1917

    The revolutionary events of 1917 had an impact not only on domestic political, economic, socio-cultural institutions and international processes, but also significantly influenced the worldview of the participants. For some of them, the rise of the Bolsheviks and the subsequent civil war became a traumatic experience that led to a significant shift in their system of values. At the same time, the internationalization of the military-political confrontation in Russia allowed foreign military personnel, intelligence officers, and diplomats to gain practical experience in dealing with socialist parties and develop their skills in countering them, which became a factor in their career advancement. It was the experts who served together in the American Embassy in Russia during the Revolution and in the American Military Mission during the intervention who later formed the core of the divisions responsible for analyzing relations with USSR in the U. S. Department of State. One of these specialists was Alfred Will Kliefoth, whose career allows us to understand many of the implicit aspects of the Soviet-American confrontation in the early years of Soviet rule. This article explores the evolution of the beliefs of A. W. Kliefoth during the early stages of his diplomatic career — from pacifism to anti-Bolshevism. The research is based on the documents of American government agencies, writings and interviews by A. W. Kliefoth, as well as the works of Russian and foreign historians.

    PHJ № 1 (49) 2026 — A. A. Efimov. THE INITIAL STAGE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT IN PALACE CITIES: STAGECOACHES AND OMNIBUSES IN THE 1830S — EARLY 1850S

    The article addresses one of the important issues of the existence of palace towns in the 19th century, highlighting the initial stage of public transport development in these settlements. In relation to the period under consideration, the author recognizes stagecoaches and omnibuses owned by companies or private entrepreneurs as such. The article notes that until the 1830s, multi-seat carriages operated only for trips between the capital, St. Petersburg and the nearest residences, Tsarskoye Selo and Peterhof. The main player in this field was the Society of the Initial Establishment of Stagecoaches, founded in 1820, which worked in both directions. At the same time, it also had local competitors. The opening of the Tsarskoye Selo Railway in the autumn of 1837 created serious competition for the Company, but entrepreneurs responded promptly, opening in 1838 a service between Gatchina and Tsarskoye Selo to replace the route from the capital, which had become unprofitable. In the following decade and a half, several new entrepreneurs appeared in the sphere of stagecoach service, organizing trips along the already mentioned routes St. Petersburg — Tsarskoye Selo, St. Petersburg — Peterhof and Tsarskoye Selo — Gatchina, and opening a service between Tsarskoye Selo and Pavlovsk, as well as intracity transportation, in Tsarskoye Selo to the railway station, and in Peterhof — to the steamship pier. The progressive development of railway service by the 1850s increasingly complicated the existence of stagecoach service. At the same time, officials, on the one hand, tightened the conditions for entrepreneurs, ordering the Gatchina — Tsarskoye Selo line to synchronize the frequency of arrival and departure of crews with the train schedule, and on the other hand, they tried to prevent the complete ruin of already operating entrepreneurs, limiting competition in the conditions of unstable passenger flow, which did not guarantee significant income even for the only transporter.